<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Refactor on Software Craftsperson</title>
    <link>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/tags/refactor/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Refactor on Software Craftsperson</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 01:26:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/tags/refactor/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Refactoring - Code written by others</title>
      <link>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/posts/2014-04-21-refactoring-code-written-by-others/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 01:26:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/posts/2014-04-21-refactoring-code-written-by-others/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As you might have noticed from my recent posts, I&amp;rsquo;ve just recently jumped from one platform to another. And my current project is a bit of a legacy thing. A lot of people worked on it previously and those who did weren&amp;rsquo;t necessarily experts in the technology that they used when they initially developed it. They did a lot of hacky things, to get things going. But such hacks are good for getting a product moving, but not really good for maintaining them.  And now that I&amp;rsquo;m having to implement changes to them, I realized how hard they have made this for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
