<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Functions on Software Craftsperson</title>
    <link>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/tags/functions/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Functions on Software Craftsperson</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:41:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/tags/functions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Bash v/s Cshell - Functions and their definitions - useful &#39;type&#39; keyword</title>
      <link>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/posts/2013-06-09-bash-vs-cshell-functions-and-their/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:41:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.softwarecraftsperson.com/posts/2013-06-09-bash-vs-cshell-functions-and-their/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey if you have worked on Linux then you have interacted with bash. Maybe not. But it is mostly likely that your default shell is bash. I&amp;rsquo;m not surprised. I&amp;rsquo;m among the few people on this planet who regularly interacts with cshell also. Thanks to the kind of work I do.&lt;br&gt;
One great feature of bash that I miss in cshell is: Functions.&lt;br&gt;
Surprised? Cshell doesn&amp;rsquo;t support functions. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t have any concept of function. If you wanted to simulate a function, you have to write another cshell script that does what your function would do and define an alias that calls it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
